Anti-Cochlear Implant Research Papers - Part 2

Anti-Cochlear Implant Research Papers - Part 2Critics of deaf culture opposing cochlear implants research papers and other documents have made some important points. One of the most important concerns the ease of processing the information, especially in the area of implants. Another point of contention concerns the reliability of the devices that will be implanted, and whether or not they are simply false promises.In the area of research papers for cochlear implants, the main issue has been who is deciding which studies and research are worthy of publication? In this article, we will discuss this issue and why it's so important.The main problem is that there is no one voice that actually oversees this process. Each institution that is involved in this process has a different agenda. Most research papers dealing with this topic include groups who are against cochlear implants, but not all of these groups are bad. What is needed is a governing body to make sure that the research proce ss is fair and ethical.A prime example of this type of corporation is The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) who oppose implant technology and all that goes along with it. They claim that implant devices do not actually cure the disorder. It just masks the problem, like an x-ray mask.The Institute of Medicine was given the task of reviewing cochlear implants. They were asked to give recommendations on how to improve the technology and to weigh whether it is ethical to use cochlear implants for those who are deaf.However, these research papers do not always support the claims of the opposition groups. For example, the Institute of Medicine points out that while the devices may only mask the problem, they will provide a quality of life for those who want to hear, and they will allow the hearing impaired individual to use devices that may allow them to hear.Instead of outright rejection of devices that are approved, research papers should highlight the benefits of using the devices. People should see that not only can they hear but they can also interact socially. The research should also show that cochlear implants will be used by individuals who are highly active in the community, and not just on the margins.The opposing group is concerned with the problem of hearing loss associated with cochlear implants. They believe that it will be difficult for those who are deaf to handle the technological aspects of cochlear implants. They also argue that the new devices will be costly, invasive, and impossible to live without.