Want to Know More About Human Condition Essay Topics?

Lack of Women Rights in Susan Glaspell´s Trifles - Free Essay Example

In the 20t century women lived a very different life than they do today. They were looked at as just housewives who should do all the chores around the house, while men work then come home and get pampered. As a result of women slaving around the house, many of them turned into very sad and lonley people. In the play Trifles American playwriter Susan Glaspell stresses the fact how women are living in a patriarical society and as a ruselt they become very isolated and end up living very sad lifes. Mrs. Wright lives a very lonley life. She lives with her husband Mr. Wright in their farmhouse. She does all the work around the house which is assumed by all men in this time period. Mrs. Wright also spends her days quilting and knotting. Thats all she really could do and as Mr Hale states Well, women are use to worring over trifles.(10) The trifles are the bird cage, the quilt and the dead canary in the pretty little box. Woman in general during that time period didnt have much to look forward to during their long days attending to their household and such. Unfortunatley Mrs. Wright is in an abusive relationship and she is mentally suffering from it. She is isolated from her friends and family. Mr. Wright is always ridculing her and she just takes it and minds her own business. Most women were treated this was and lived very similar lives as Mrs. Hale says I might have known she needed help! I know how things can be†for women. I tell you, its queer, Mrs. Peters. We live close together and we live far apart. We all go through the same things†its all just a different kind of the same thing.(138) Before Mrs. Wright had gotten marriard she lived a very happy life. She was viewed as a nice and inosent person. After she got married her life started to go into a downwards spiral and there was nothing she could do about it. At the time there was no such thing as womans rights or respecting them in general and unfortunatley a lot of woman were not living the lifes they thought they would live. They lived in a male dominated society. Mr. Wright was reviewd as a fine man who did a good job with his responsibilities. He did not really care about his wife. He abandoned her happiness and did not care much about her opinions. Mrs. Wright really enjoyed singing but Mr. Wright did not apporive of such thing. He took awy many aspects of her freedom. Mrs. Wright was getting sick of being ridiculed everyday of her life. One day Mr. Wright killed her canary. That bird was her only company during her long, lonley and isolated days. The canarys singing would put Mrs. Wright at ease and take her away from her isolation for short periods of time. The canary and Mrs. Wright were alike in many different ways. Mrs. Wright and the bird both enjoyed singing but Mr. Wright destroyed that for the both of them. As it states in the play No, Wright wouldnt like the bird†a thing that sang. She used to sing. He killed that, too. (124) They were alike in the case of both being caged up all day in the house while Mr. Wright was home. As of today women are not seen in the same way as women were in the 20th century. It is not as much as a male dominated societey as of today, women have a place in the publics sphereWomen now can play the role as the money maker in households and it is not looked at in an uncanny way at all. While some men in this day in age play the role as the housewife. Women are respected and have a say in everything. They have just as much as a place in this world as men do.z

Anti-Cochlear Implant Research Papers - Part 2

Anti-Cochlear Implant Research Papers - Part 2Critics of deaf culture opposing cochlear implants research papers and other documents have made some important points. One of the most important concerns the ease of processing the information, especially in the area of implants. Another point of contention concerns the reliability of the devices that will be implanted, and whether or not they are simply false promises.In the area of research papers for cochlear implants, the main issue has been who is deciding which studies and research are worthy of publication? In this article, we will discuss this issue and why it's so important.The main problem is that there is no one voice that actually oversees this process. Each institution that is involved in this process has a different agenda. Most research papers dealing with this topic include groups who are against cochlear implants, but not all of these groups are bad. What is needed is a governing body to make sure that the research proce ss is fair and ethical.A prime example of this type of corporation is The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) who oppose implant technology and all that goes along with it. They claim that implant devices do not actually cure the disorder. It just masks the problem, like an x-ray mask.The Institute of Medicine was given the task of reviewing cochlear implants. They were asked to give recommendations on how to improve the technology and to weigh whether it is ethical to use cochlear implants for those who are deaf.However, these research papers do not always support the claims of the opposition groups. For example, the Institute of Medicine points out that while the devices may only mask the problem, they will provide a quality of life for those who want to hear, and they will allow the hearing impaired individual to use devices that may allow them to hear.Instead of outright rejection of devices that are approved, research papers should highlight the benefits of using the devices. People should see that not only can they hear but they can also interact socially. The research should also show that cochlear implants will be used by individuals who are highly active in the community, and not just on the margins.The opposing group is concerned with the problem of hearing loss associated with cochlear implants. They believe that it will be difficult for those who are deaf to handle the technological aspects of cochlear implants. They also argue that the new devices will be costly, invasive, and impossible to live without.